Architecture review
Service boundaries, data model, coupling and failure modes, assessed against where the business is going rather than against a textbook.
Initializing systems...
Technical Consulting
Sometimes you do not need a team — you need an honest answer. Whether the platform will hold at ten times the load, whether the codebase you are about to acquire is worth what you are paying, whether the rewrite your team is proposing is necessary. We review, we measure, and we write it down in language a board can read.
Service boundaries, data model, coupling and failure modes, assessed against where the business is going rather than against a textbook.
Code quality, test coverage, branching and release process, and the practical reasons your team's delivery has slowed down.
Cloud configuration, access control, secrets, backups and restore testing, dependency and vulnerability posture.
Profiling the paths that are actually slow — queries, N+1s, cold starts, cache misses, front-end Core Web Vitals — with measured before-and-after.
Capacity modelling, cost projection, and a sequenced migration plan with the risky steps isolated and reversible.
We agree the decision the review has to inform. A review without a decision behind it produces a document nobody acts on.
Read access to the repository and infrastructure, plus interviews with the people who run it day to day.
Static review, profiling and load measurement, with findings ranked by risk and by cost to fix.
A written report: what is fine, what is a real risk, what it would take to address, and what we would do first.
A session with your team and, where useful, a separate one for non-technical stakeholders.
If you want us to implement the recommendations, we can — but the review stands on its own and is priced separately.
Tell us the decision you are trying to make and what you are worried about. We will propose a review scope and what it will answer.
Start the conversation